Monday, December 3, 2018

"THE SUBLIME, THE GRAND, THE TENDER": THE STORY OF HANDEL'S MESSIAH

George Frideric Handel
The 1728 portrait by Balthasar Denner
National Portrait Gallery

The enduring masterwork that is Handel's Messiah is a foundational pillar of the western Canon. 
George Frideric Handel (born Georg Friedrich Händel) hailed from Halle, in the Duchy of Magdeburg in Saxony, in that annus mirabilis of 1685, a magical year which also witnessed the birth of two other Baroque giants, Johann Sebastian Bach and Domenico Scarlatti. 
A gifted violinist, harpsichordist and organist by his teenage years, Handel did his Grand Tour in Italy, from 1706 to 1710, where he was deeply informed by Italian operatic and oratorio styles. Handel's early efforts in these genres were applauded by his Italian patrons, with his opera, Agrippina, being all the rage in Venice. While in Rome, Prince Francesco Ruspoli bestowed upon him the monicker, il caro Sassone ("The beloved Saxon")
Handel left Rome in 1710 and travelled to Hanover,  to work for George, the Elector of Hanover, who later became that George, King George I of England. Handel left his employ in 1711 and settled in London, three years before George himself came over for his coronation. The King and Handel were at odds for a while, perhaps because Handel had left Hanover, but after Handel presented him with the elegant Wassermusik (Water Music Suites), things went smoothly thereafter.  Handel eventually even became a naturalized British subject, in 1727.

The Chandos Portrait of Handel
by John Thornhill    1720

Although Handel composed several oratorios soon after arriving in England, he made his name by composing operas, most of which were scored for Italian libretti (opere serie, or "serious" operas). For these works, he wrote a seemingly endless succession of bravura arias sung by many of Europe's most famous and high-flying prima donnas and castrati, of which the London audience could never get enough. They would crow that Handel was the greatest German to bring Italian opera to an English audience.
Handel crafted a trove of music in other genres - odes, anthems, cantatas, keyboard works, chamber music, serenades, and songs - but for two decades he composed mostly operas. However, by the end of the 1730s, the public’s appetite for opera seria had faded. That posed little problem for Handel, as he promptly switched gears and reinvented himself as a composer of oratorios, eventually writing twenty-seven of them, virtually all set to English texts.

Handel at work
by Philip Mercier   c. 1735

An oratorio is a composition for orchestra, choir and vocal soloists. Whereas opera is musical theater, and both oratorios and operas contain dramatic characters and arias, oratorios are usually composed around sacred topics, are not staged, nor are there props or costumes. In an oratorio, the chorus plays an essential role.


Charles Jennens (1700-1773)
The librettist of Messiah

In July, 1741, the librettist Charles Jennens offered Handel a set of passages from the King James Bible as material for a new oratorio, to be named Messiah. They had already worked together on several prior efforts, including the oratorios Saul and Israel in Egypt. Jennens was optimistic: "I hope that Handel will lay out his whole Genius and Skill upon it, that the Composition may excel all his former Compositions, as the Subject excels every other subject. The Subject is Messiah."


Jennens chose most of his selections for Messiah from the Old Testament (Isaiah, Malachi, and Psalm excerpts from the Book of Common Prayer), with verses from two of the canonical gospels of the New Testament (Matthew and Luke), the Book of Revelation, and the epistle of Paul to the Corinthians. 
The texts chosen by Jennens do not flow as a narrative, but rather, are a collection of passages which relate to the prophecy and witness of Christ's birth (Part the First), Christ's death and resurrection (Part the Second), and the redemptive response of believers (Part the Third). The oratorio follows the liturgical year. 

The textual material seemed to have resonated quite well with Handel, who began composing Messiah on August 22, 1741 and completed it in just 24 days. He signed the autograph manuscript, SDG, an acronymic for Solo Deo Gloria, "Only to God goes Glory," prompting the suggestion that he had received some form of divine inspiration in writing the oratorio, given the rapidity of its composition and the beauty of its form. This astonishing speed, quality and inventiveness were a Handelian trademark; four weeks after completing Messiah, he put the finishing touches on his next oratorio, Samson.

Around this time, William Cavendish, the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, invited Handel to Dublin to conduct a series of benefit concerts. Handel, who was already frustrated with the fickle taste of the London public, leapt at the opportunity. Messiah thus had its premiere not in London, where Handel’s many operas and prior oratorios had debuted, but in Dublin, at the newly opened Neale's Great Music Hall on Fishamble Street, to the consternation of a great many back in England. Jennens himself was chagrined, commenting to a friend that “it was some mortification to me to find out that instead of performing Messiah here he has gone to Ireland with it."


Neale's Great Music Hall
Fishamble Street, Dublin


Messiah was a smash hit from the very beginning. The morning after the first public rehearsal, a Dublin Journal critic raved, "it was allowed by the greatest Judges to be the finest 'Composition of Musick' that was ever Heard."  A week before the premiere, concert flyers around town provided this caution: "so that the largest possible Audience can be admitted to the concert, Ladies are asked not to wear Hoops in their Dresses, and Gentlemen are requested to Remove their Swords." 

The premiere, on 13 April 13, 1742 was an unqualified success, with over 700 people jostling for the 600 available seats. A reviewer in another Dublin paper the next morning gushed that, "Words are wanting to express the exquisite Delight that it afforded the Crowded and Admiring audience. The Sublime, the Grand, the Tender, adapted to the most Elevated, Majestic and moving Words, conspired to transport and charm the ravished ear."

The first London performance of Messiah did not take place until 1743 and received mixed reviews. Handel actually had to change its title to A Sacred Oratorio because of objections to using Biblical texts and theatrical performers in a concert setting.   However, by 1750, with a benefit concert for the Foundling Hospital to which Handel also donated the autograph manuscript of the work, Messiah became a beloved annual London ritual which continues to this day.

A page from the autograph manuscript
of Handel's Messiah


Messiah is a universe unto itself. Handel, a successful composer of opera, crafted Messiah in operatic terms. The three Parts of the Messiah can be likened to the three Acts of his opere serie. Each Part is subdivided into Scenes. Each Scene is comprised of recitatives, choruses and arias. The arias require vocalists with operatic training to bring out all their texture and nuance. 

Handel was also a master of pacing and drama, purposely composing a restrained and almost muted orchestral line, with spare but effective use of trumpets.  Messiah unfolds with a gentle orchestral overture, what he termed a "Sinfony," as a plaintive prelude before the tenor and chorus enter. 

Handel cleverly employed word painting to enliven Jennens' text. In the opening aria, "Ev'ry Valley Shall be Exalted," for example, Handel crafts a wavering melody to underpin the word "crooked," whereas he uses sustained whole notes to support the word "straight."
In the middle of Part the First, another wonder occurs, a moment when time stands still, as we hear the sweetly flowing pifa, a pastoral instrumental interlude which is evocative of the music of the pifferai, shepherd bagpipers who played in the streets of Rome during Christmastime.

The soprano's aria "Rejoice Greatly" is a tour de force, with stratospheric melismas on the word "Rejoice." 
In the aria, "Thou Shalt Break Them," from Part the Second, the text is accompanied by angular, ascending and descending lines in the strings, which evoke something that is shattered.  In Part the Third, there is a stunning episode where the trumpet brilliantly echoes the powerful bass solo, "The Trumpet Shall Sound."

The splendid choruses in Messiah are each an extraordinary example of power and dramatic effect while bringing out the textual setting. This is most evident in the Hallelujah Chorus, where one hears layer upon layer of intertwined and glorious melody. The story goes that at the first London performance, King George II was in attendance, and was so taken by the now famous Hallelujah Chorus, that he stood up, setting a precedent that is still adhered to by audiences worldwide. 

Although Messiah is not centered on any specific tonality, it aspires towards the light and glory of the bright key of D major (two sharps). Indeed the sections which are accompanied by trumpet, and the orchestral ending of the oratorio, are all centered within that brilliant tonic. 

Handel in 1748
by Thomas Hudson

Handel conducted Messiah over forty times during his life, and tinkered with it incessantly, altering the orchestral forces or changing the key of certain arias, better to suit a particular vocal soloist. Foreseeing its popularity, Handel purposely wrote a spare orchestral score for Messiah, assuming that future composers would modify it, adding new instruments here and vocal color there. 

In 1789, Mozart famously adapted the work to a German text, Der Messias, enriching it with the woody timbre of clarinets, amplifying the bassoon line, and replacing trumpets with French horns, largely because the rarefied technique of playing celebratory trumpet had become a lost art. Beethoven, in his Missa Solemnis, channeled Handel's "And He Shall Reign" fugue. Messiah continued to gain such popularity that by the 1880s it was being served up with gargantuan forces; an 1883 performance at the Crystal Palace in London featured five hundred orchestral musicians and a chorus of four thousand!

Most Handel Messiah performances today are based on the 1959 Novello vocal score, edited by Watkins Shaw, which in turn is based on the revered 1902 edition of Ebenezer Prout, with Parts and Scenes stemming from the first London performance of 1743. 

Handel in 1756, at age 71, blind and paralytic,
with a copy of the Messiah
by Thomas Hudson


Handel’s health inexorably declined through the last eight years of his life. He lost vision and was partially paralyzed as a consequence of a series of strokes. He became more religious and introspective, retreating into a cocoon of solitude. He continued to play the organ and occasionally acceded to conduct his beloved Messiah. Yet his will and drive remained indefatigable: during the last week of his life, he was still able to attend a performance of his favorite composition. 

Handel died on April 14, 1759, at the age of seventy-four, and was buried in Westminster Abbey. Having never married and having had no children, he left his estate to his niece, Johanna, and per four separate codicils, to a few friends, servants, and charities.

Handel's greatest composition, Messiah, lives on as one of the most beloved works of classical music. It is heard around the world, by small forces and large, in intimate historically performed efforts, or with large instrumental and choral groups.  Yet, there is no right or wrong Messiah. There is simply Messiah, and it remains what it had always been envisioned by "Mr. Handel:"  that wondrous oratorio - ever sonorous, sacred and sublime.

G.F. Handel, with the score of
"I Know that My Redeemer Liveth"
from Messiah
Handel Memorial
Westminster Abbey, London








Sunday, September 2, 2018

THE MARRIAGE OF THE ARNOLFINI

THE ARNOLFINI PORTRAIT:
TRANSFIGURED REALTY
Vincent de Luise M.D.

Transfigured Reality
The Marriage of the Arnolfini
Jan (Johannes) van Eyck 1434
NGA London

The Arnolfini Portrait
Jan van Eyck, 1434
National Gallery of Art, London


Most art historians of a certain vintage grew up reading the illuminating texts of Erwin Panofsky, Professor of Art in Germany and also at the IFA at NYU, whose crystalline and deeply thought-out exegeses of pictorial art brought together multiple domains of connoisseurship and enlightened generations. Today, his art historical works are sadly not as well known, but his ideas, Kantian as well as Hegelian, remain seminal.
In the famous painting we are gazing upon, The Marriage of the Arnolfini, a painting which revolutionized western Art, Panofsky asks us this question:
Do mirrors reveal the invisible, or do they distort the visible?
At first, we see (or we think we see) a Marriage of two people. HE is probably Giovanni Nicolai di Arnolfini (or maybe his cousin, Giovannni di Arrigo, no one knows for sure ) and SHE is likely Costanza Trenta (or perhaps she is Giovanna Cenami, no one knows for sure).
HE is lifting up his right hand almost in benediction, about to place it on HER right hand as an act of FEDES (Latin for Fidelity).
But then there is the symbology: there is the pair of shoes in the lower left (why did HE take his shoes off?), the oranges (very rare in the cold climate of Bruges) on the side table and the window sill ( one needs to be rich to obtain oranges in Flanders), the perfectly rendered chandelier (did JvE use a Camera Obscura to paint this masterpiece? It is a topic I discuss in detail in my Visual Perception Lectures, and also, why is the Dog not in the mirror?), there is only one lit candle in the chandelier (vide infra), and all the other iconography that makes for such delicious fodder to use in term papers, PhD theses and such.
So, this is a painting of a marriage, attested to by the painter himself, in this case Jan van Eyck, who paints himself in the painting ! ( see in the comments below the magnified image of the convex mirror in the background - the perfect, optically upright and minified image in the mirror, with a tiny JvE in it, one of the first, if not the first, western painting to use a mirror). 


Detail of the background of the painting, showing a convex mirror,
and van Eyck's signature "Johannes van Eyck fuit hic"
The convex mirror is optically correct - showing an upright, virtual, minified image,
which includes the painter himself


Indeed we read on the back wall “Johannes van Eyck fuit hic 1434- “Jan van Eyck was here” and the date of 1434. So, is this painting a “contratto visivo,” a visible contract, of a man and his soon-to-be wife.
Or is it ?
Panofsky discusses the term “Transfigured Reality” to point out that the iconography of a painting can reveal things quite the opposite of what the viewer is seeing.
In this case, HER head covering is that of someone already married. Is SHE pregnant or is that just a flouncy dress style of the era? What’s that dog doing there (is it to remind us of FEDES again?), the bright red fourposter bed on the right, and what about that one lit candle? One lit candle, hovering over HIs head, but not over HERS?
Is this painting then not a contratto visivo, but rather, a memento mori, a painting to honor and memorialize a deceased HER?
Hmmmmm. The paradoxes never cease.....

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

THE ARISTOCRACY OF BEAUTY

Vincent de Luise MD

Among the great portrait painters of Royalty and the Aristocracy were Joseph Karl Stieler (1781-1858) and his illustrious portege Franz Xaver Winterhalter (1805 - 1873). 
Some of Stieler's most famous portraits are housed in the Gallery of Beauties, the Schonheitengalerie, in Schloss Nymphenburg near Munich.
Winterhalter stood metaphorically on the artistic shoulders of Stieler and painted hundreds of portraits of the nobility. 


Barbara (Barbe) Dmitrievna Mergasova Rimsky-Korsakova
Franz Xaver Winterhalter (1864)

It was Winterhalter's particular skill in capturing the pulchritudinous aspects of many aristocratic women of his time (even if they were not naturally beautiful) that has made his name almost synonymous with the genre. 
His detractors called his art, "unnatural beauty." His admirers, on the other hand, i.e. the many aristocrats who paid him handsomely, as it were, for his portraits of them, of course thought this work to all about "natural beauty." 
In the case of the Countess Barbara (Barbe) Rimsky-Korsakova (1836 - 1875), whom we see here in one of her favorite gauzy, diaphanous dresses, Winterhalter didn't have to dissemble at all. She was a true natural beauty, of noble Polish blood, a fiery, confident and independent woman who caused episodic scandals as a scantily clad "belle of the ball." In 1850, at the age of 16, she married the 20 year old Nikolai Sergeevich Rimsky-Korsakov (a distant and much older relative of the composer).
They were memorialized in Tolstoy's novel, Anna Karenina, as General Yegorushka Korsunsky and Madame Lidi Korsunsky. The Korsunskys were known by all who mattered, and were likened by the author to "white wolves." 






Sunday, July 15, 2018

VISUALIZING MOZART: A Study in Iconography and Ophthalmology

VISUALIZING MOZART:
A Study in Iconography and Ophthalmology
Vincent P. de Luise M.D., F.A.C.S.


Wolfgang Amade' Mozart in the oil portrait
by his brother-in-law, Joseph Lange
Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum

Here is the link to an article I wrote, Visualizing Mozart, that was published in the May 2018 edition of the Hektoen International Journal of Medical Humanities. 

The article is best viewed on a laptop or desktop:


http://hekint.org/2018/05/15/visualizing-mozart/


Tuesday, May 8, 2018

WHAT DID MOZART LOOK LIKE?

A Review of Mozart Iconography
Vincent P. de Luise, M.D.


Wolfgang Amade' Mozart (1756 - 1791)
The oil portrait by his brother-in-law, Johann Joseph Lange


It has often been said that to discover the real Mozart, one need simply listen to his ineffable music. Yet, questions still arise: What did Mozart look like? Which are the true portraits that were made of him during his life? Can an artist capture genius in a painting? 

Of the hundreds of images of Wolfgang Amade' Mozart, only about a dozen have been attested. The early 20th century biographer Arthur Schurig crystallized this apparent Mozartean paradox: "Mozart has been the subject of more portraits that have no connection with his actual appearance than any other famous man; and there is no famous person of whom a more worshipful posterity has had a more incorrect physical appearance than is generally the case with Mozart." (1) 

One reason that has been offered for the paucity of vetted depictions of Mozart is that he was not painted by the more prominent artists of his time, as had been Johann Sebastian Bach, Johann Christian Bach, Handel, Haydn and Beethoven. No Haussmann (JS Bach), Gainsborough (JC Bach), Hudson (Handel), Hoppner (Haydn) or Waldmuller (Beethoven) portrayed Mozart.

Mozart's sister Maria Anna (Nannerl) captured an aspect of him: "... My brother was a rather pretty child." Later, she added that he was "small, thin, and pale in color, and lacking in any pretensions as to physiognomy and bodily appearance." The composer Johann Adolph Hasse wrote that "the boy Mozart is handsome, graceful and full of good manners." Michael Kelly, the tenor who sang the roles of Don Basilio and Don Curzio in the premiere of Le Nozze di Figaro, famously reminisced about Mozart in 1826: "He was a remarkably small man, very thin and pale, with a profusion of fine hair, of which he was rather vain...."   

Roland Tenschert published an initial series of Mozart portraits in 1931. (2) The musicologist and historian Otto Eric Deutsch codified Mozart iconography in a seminal article in the 1956 bicentennial volume, The Mozart Companion (3), and further detailed his findings, where he identified twelve portraits that have the provenance to be considered authentic. (4,5)

Since then, several portraits have been put forth which purport to represent Mozart: the Joseph Grassi snuffbox enamel; the portrait from the estate of the Mozarts' landlord, Johann Lorenz Hagenauer (the painting referred to as "The Man in the Red Coat"); the Edlinger portrait; the Albi Rosenthal sketch, the Fruhstorfer portrait of a boy with a toy soldier; the J.B. Delahaye portrait;  the portrait by Leopold Bode; the portrait of a boy with a bird's nest at one time attributed to Zoffany; and a portrait attributed to Greuze. The Grassi has been contested. The Hagenauer, Edlinger, Fruhstorfer, Delahaye, and Greuze have undergone biometric analysis. The Edlinger has been proven not to be Mozart. The Zoffany is no longer considered to be either painted by Zoffany nor of Mozart. None of these portraits resembles the vetted portraits of Mozart. (These portraits and references are included in the Addendum below). 

A small enamel of a young man, putatively of Mozart, was sold at auction at Sotheby's in 2014. (6) The enamel was supposedly given by Wolfgang to his cousin, Maria Anna Thekla Mozart ("Basle"), in 1777. Deutsch listed it as "formerly in the possession of Mozart's cousin, Anna Maria Thekla (nicknamed, Bäsle) Mannheim 1777," yet placed it in the category of spurious works. It has been critiqued as an idealized and stylized portrait, a popular technique at the time that was mass produced and not necessarily an accurate representation of the sitter. However, the provenance of the miniature enamel is strong. It has been hypothesized that Mozart may have commissioned this portrait of himself to give to his cousin and requested an idealized depiction.

In 1947, a bronze "death mask," said to be that of Mozart, was found in an antique shop in Vienna. Legend has it that a gypsum plaster death mask was made "shortly after Mozart died," either by Josef Deym von Stritetz or Taddeus Ribola. Upon the death of the craftsman, the mask went to his (the craftsman's) widow, and when she died, the mask vanished. Mozart's widow Constanze Mozart Nissen wrote that she had been given "a replica" of the death mask, presumably also in plaster, but had "clumsily broken it" around 1821. Most scholars do not accept the bronze death mask as authentic. (7,8)

The following are the canonical portraits of Mozart as articulated by Deutsch. (4,5,6) The posthumous Barbara Kraft portrait derives from several of the others, so the number of uniquely identifiable Mozart portraits is eleven:

1. The Boy Mozart, oil painting, attributed to Pietro Antonio Lorenzoni, 1763 (Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, Salzburg). The Lorenzoni is contested. The head has been spliced into a stock painting of the clothing.

Wolfgang Mozart in 1763 at age 7.
Attributed to  Pietro Lorenzoni.





2. Leopold Mozart with Wolfgang and Maria Anna ("Nannerl"), watercolor by Louis Carrogis de Carmontelle, November 1763 (Musée Condé, Chantilly). Three variants (Musée Carnavalet, Paris; British Museum, London; Castle Howard, York), an engraving by Delafosse in 1764 after Carmontelle's painting (Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris) and several other copies are known to exist. If the youth at the keyboard is Wolfgang, he looks nothing like the Wolfgang of the Lorenzoni or the Verona portraits.
Leopold, Wolfgang and Maria Anna (Nannerl) Mozart 
by Louis Carrogis de Carmontelle



3. The Tea Party at Prince Louis-François de Conti's, in the 'Temple', oil painting by Michel Barthélemy Ollivier, 1766 (Musée du Louvre, Paris). The head of the person playing the harpsichord is so small that the painting, per O.E. Deutsch, is "iconographically worthless." In addition, the individual playing the harpsichord looks to be about 50 and not ten years of age, and cannot be seen clearly. Unless Mozart had progeria, which he did not, this is not him.

The Tea Party in "The Temple"
by Michel Barthelmey Ollivier 1766




4. Wolfgang at 14 years of age at the piano. This oil is the so-called "Verona portrait," attributed to Saverio dalla Rosa, or his maternal uncle, Giambettino Cignaroli, or the artists may have collaborated. 1770 (Private Collection). 


Mozart at the keyboard, 1770
The so-called "Verona Portrait"
by Saverio dalla Rosa or Giambettino Cignaroli



5. Miniature on ivory, attributed to Martin Knoller, 1773 (Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, Salzburg). 
The 1773 miniature on ivory
attributed to Martin Knoller




6. The anonymous portrait in enamel, 1777, presumably of Wolfgang, that he may have given to his cousin Maria Anna Thekla (the "Basle"), auctioned at Sotheby's in 2014. (6)
The 1777 enamel miniature that Wolfgang
may have given to his cousin, Maria Anna Thekla Mozart (the "Basle")


7. The 1777 copy of Mozart as Knight of the Golden Spur, anonymous oil painting, (Museo Internazionale e Biblioteca della Musica di Bologna). The 1770 original oil has been lost. Leopold wrote that Wolfgang was ill when this was painted.

The 1777 copy of the lost 1770 oil
Mozart with the Order of the Golden Spur



8. The Family Portrait, an oil painting attributed to Johann Nepomuk della Croce, 1780-1781 (Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, Salzburg). Anna Maria Walburga Pertl Mozart (the mother of Wolfgang and Nannerl, and Leopold's spouse) is seen on the wall in the portrait. She died in Paris in 1778. In 1829, when Mary and Vincent Novello met with and interviewed Constanze Mozart Nissen, she stated that the image of Wolfgang in this painting was "one of the best likenesses" of him. (9)

The Mozart Family Portrait 1780-1781
attributed to Johann Nepomuk della Croce


9. Oil painting by Johann Joseph Lange, (?1782) (Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, Salzburg. Sometimes entitled "Mozart at the Piano"). At some later time, the head of this portrait was affixed to a larger canvas, presumably with the intention of depicting Mozart seated at the piano, but this larger painting was unfinished; it is the portrait that we see today at the Wohnhaus across from the Mozarteum. The portrait itself is on a side wall, in shadow, behind a velvet rope.  
In 1829, in an interview with the Novellos, Constanze Mozart Nissen stated that this Lange portrait and the della Croce painting were the best likenesses of her brother Wolfgang. The Novellos went on to write that, "..... by far the best likeness of him (Mozart), in Mrs. Constanze Nissen's opinion, is the painting in oils done by the Husband of Madame Lange (the eldest sister of Mrs. Nissen)....." who is the very same Joseph Lange who painted this portrait.(9)
Lorenz has researched the Lange portrait in the context of Lange's other paintings. His conclusion is that "the Mozart portrait by Joseph Lange is not an unfinished painting of "Mozart at the Piano," but an unfinished enlargement of an original miniature of Mozart's head." (10)  In specular reflection, a rectangular outline can be observed around Mozart's head and torso.  Lorenz has shown that this was the earlier, smaller, finished portrait, which was at some point in time cut out of its original frame and mounted into this larger, unfinished canvas.
Mozart, by his brother-in-law, Joseph Lange.


10. Silhouette, engraved by Hieronymous Löschenkohl, 1785, for his Musik- und Theater-Almanach of 1786 (one copy in the Historisches Museum der Stadt Wien). The silhouette is contested. Löschenkohl correctly uses Mozart's middle name, Amade'.

The Silhouette of 1784/1785 
by Johann Hieronymus Loschenkohl




11. Medallion in red wax, by Leonard Posch, 1788 (formerly Mozart-Museum, Salzburg: missing since 1945); Deutsch lists three other variants.(4)  Grosspietsch describes six variants.(11)

The 1788 medallion in red wax by Leonard Posch.



12. The silverpoint drawing by Dorothea (Doris) Stock, 1789 (Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, Salzburg). This tiny and meticulously rendered portrait of Mozart, about four inches by three inches in greatest dimension, is at the Wohnhaus under glass with a convex lens over it.


The 1789 silverpoint by Doris Stock



13. The posthumous Barbara Kraft portrait of 1819 in the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Vienna. Nannerl Mozart lent Kraft the della Croce painting and two other portraits (both now lost), upon which she based this painting.
The 1819 posthumous oil by Barbara Kraft.


Christoph Grosspietsch has written a detailed treatise on Mozart iconography. (11) An introductory article with excellent images can be found here (12). There is a website (www.mozartportraits.com) with an extensive catalogue of authenticated, inauthentic, under study, and controversial images of Mozart (13).  

Mozart scholar Cliff Eisen has offered an eloquent summary on the function of Mozart portraiture:

"Very few images of Mozart are universally agreed to be authentic. Yet the acceptance of these portraits - as well as more recently discovered portraits purporting to be Mozart - is less the result of provenance or connoisseurship than the fact that they are shrines at which Mozart scholars and Mozart lovers uncritically worship. They are representations of how we would like Mozart to look - in short they satisfy our visual biographical fancy. This is true above all of the unfinished portrait by Joseph Lange. The musicologist H.C. Robbins Landon described it as the most intimate, most profound, of all the mature  Mozart portraits - the only one, really, to catch the ambivalent nature of Mozart's mercurial mind and to show the profoundly pessimistic side of his many-sided genius." (14)


@ 2017 Vincent P. de Luise, M.D.

References 

1. Schurig, A. Wolfgang Mozart: Sein Leben und sein Werk Insel-Verlag, Leipzig 1913.
2. Tenschert, R. Mozart: Ein Kunstlerleben in Bildern und Doumenten, 1931.
3. Deutsch, O.E. Mozart Iconography, in The Mozart Companion, Robbins-Landon, H.C and Mitchell, D, eds.  Oxford University Press, 1956.
4. Deutsch, O.E. Mozart und seine Welt in zeitgenossischen BildernM. Zenger, ed. Verlag Kassel, Barenreiter, 1961.
5. Zenger, M. and Deutsch, O.E. Mozart and his World in Contemporary Pictures. Neue Ausgabe Samtlicher Werke. X. Supplement. Kassel. Barenreiter Kassel, 1987.
6.http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.178.html/2014/music-continental-books-manuscripts-l14406
7. https://edwardianpiano.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/count-josef-deyms-art-collection-and-mozarts-death-mask/
8. Karhausen,L. The Bleeding of Mozart, XLibris  2011 .
9. Novello, V. and Novello, M. "A Mozart Pilgrimage- Being the Travel Diaries of Vincent and Mary Novello in the year 1829, N. de Medici di Marignano and Robert Hughes, London, 1955, reprinted 1975.  
10. Lorenz, M. http://michaelorenz.blogspot.com/2012/09/joseph-langes-mozart-portrait.html
11. Grosspietsch, C. Mozart-Bilder / Bilder Mozarts  Salzburg, Verlag Anton Pustet, Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum, 2013.
12. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/09/what-mozart-really-looked-like-14-portraits-of-the-composer-photos-music.html
13. www.mozartportraits.com
14. Eisen, C. https://www.apollo-magazine.com/features/5569418/a-new-portrait-of-mozart.thtml  

Addendum

One of the more interesting portraits that may have been painted during Mozart's life is the miniature portrait enamel on a tobacco snuff box, attributed to Joseph Grassi. The portrait is said to have been painted around 1783. It is owned by the Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum and has been accepted by Christoph Grosspietsch and the Mozarteum. The archivist Michael Lorenz has questioned the attribution of the portrait to Grassi and has also pointed out an error in the middle name: there was an artist by the name of Joseph Mathias Grassi (not Joseph Maria Grassi). (1)


Miniature enamel on a tobacco snuffbox
attributed to Joseph Grassi



The Fruhstorfer Portrait of a boy with a toy soldier



The Delahaye Portrait  c.1772
 Portrait  by Johann Georg Edlinger 1789-1790
Professor Rudolph Angermuller has done 
research to suggest that this is not Mozart
but rather, a Bavarian butcher from Munich



The Portrait in the Hagenauer Estate
("The Man in the Red Coat") 1789-1790





The anonymous Albi Rosenthal silverpoint drawing c. 1790
(see H.C. Robbins-Landon, The Mozart Compendium, pp.112-113)



The Bode portrait. This portrait was executed by Leopold Bode in 1859, 68 years after Mozart died. Bode stated that he had used the 1770 Verona portrait as a template.

Portrait of a young man by Leopold Bode 1859


For decades, the c. 1770 painting by Viennese artist Franz Taddaus Helbling in the Stiftung Internationale Mozarteum was thought to be Mozart. It has been proven that the individual in the painting is not Mozart, but rather, Carl Graf Firmian.

Carl Graf Firmian at the piano by Franz Taddaus Helbling, c. 1770



A portrait known as the "Boy with a Bird's Nest" had at one time been attributed to the prominent British painter John Zoffany (1733-1810), and the individual depicted had been thought to represent Mozart. 
This portrait is not at all as finely rendered as the many superb portraits of children that Zoffany painted. The Mozarteum has firmly rejected the painting as being Mozart. The Zoffany scholar Martin Postle does not consider the portrait to have been painted by Zoffany, writing that "it has been stated, incorrectly, that a painting of a young boy holding a birds nest.... is a portrait of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart by John Zoffany." So, here we have a "cautionary tale," as Dexter Edge has articulated in a detailed analysis.(9) This painting is neither by Zoffany nor of Mozart.
Boy with a Bird's Nest.


A portrait of a young man, dated 1763/1764 and attributed to Jean-Baptiste Greuze, at the Yale University Collection of Musical Instruments, had at one time been said to be Mozart. Scholars have not accepted this attestation. On the label next to the portrait is written the following: " Attributed to Jean-Baptiste Greuze (1725-1805). Signed "BJG." Yale University, New Haven Connecticut, acquired 1960. Exhibitions: Mozarteum Salzburg, Austria 1910. The identification of the sitter as Mozart has never been confirmed and should be treated with skepticism."




@ 2017 Vincent P. de Luise M.D.

1. http://michaelorenz.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-newly-discovered-mozart-portrait.html

2. http://www.neuroscience-of-music.se/ormen/Edlinger%20Mozart-2.htm

3. http://www.neuroscience-of-music.se/ormen/Fruhstorfer%20Mozart.htm


4. http://www.neuroscience-of-music.se/ormen/Delahaye_Mozart_Braun.htm


5. http://www.neuroscience-of-music.se/ormen/Greuze_Mozart_Braun.htm


6. http://www.neuroscience-of-music.se/ormen/Hagenauer%20Mozart.htm


7. Robbins-Landon, H.C. The Mozart Compendium, New York, Schirmer Books, 1990, pp. 112-113

8. Lorenz, M. http://michaelorenz.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-newly-discovered-mozart-portrait.html

9. Edge, D. Not Mozart, Not Zoffany: A Cautionary Tale http://www.academia.edu/7646630/Not_Mozart_Not_Zoffany_A_Cautionary_Tale_