Der Messias (KV 572), his 1789 transcription of Handel's Messiah, at Christ and St Stephen's Church, NYC. Opera Company of Brooklyn and a splendid cast of conservatory-trained soloists and chorus will be conducted by maestro Jay Meetze.
"Mozart knew how to give new life to Handel’s noble inspirations by means of the warmth of his own feeling, and through the magic of his own instrumental style to make them enjoyable for our age."
F.X. Nemetschek, Mozart's first biographer, 1808
 |
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759) by Balthasar Denner (c. 1728) |
Transcriptions of musical compositions, especially famous ones, are a mixed bag. As accomplished a pair of pianists as you and your friend might be, it should still be evident as you play the four-hand piano transcriptions of Beethoven’s Eroica and Schubert’s Unfinished symphonies, that they are nowhere near as moving as the composers’ original orchestrations. As another example, Ravel’s magisterial symphonic reworking of Mussorgsky’s original piano composition, Pictures at an Exhibition, is a composition that is far richer and more textured, and more popular as well.
There is another type of transcription, an adaptation and a "renovation" really, that was the result of Wolfgang Mozart’s genius, the marvelous result of a commission he received to re-orchestrate a German text setting of Handel’s famous and enduring oratorio, Messiah.
The well-known story of Handel’s life and the composition of his Messiah (HWV 56) are part of the fabric and lore of music history.
Handel was
born in Halle, Germany, in that magical year of 1685, which also witnessed the
birth of J.S. Bach and Domenico Scarlatti. Handel did his "Grand Tour" in
Italy, from 1706 to 1710, during which time he was informed by the operatic and
oratorio styles prevalent there and also tried his hand at them, to great effect. These works were immediately applauded by his Italian patrons, especially Prince Ruspoli, who bestowed upon him the monicker, "il caro Sassone," "the beloved Saxon."
Handel then returned to Saxony to work for George,
the Elector of Hanover, who later became that George, King George I of England. Handel settled in London in 1712, preceding his Hanoverian employer by a few years; the King was miffed for a while, but after Handel presented him with the Music for The Royal Fireworks in 1717, they worked it out. Handel eventually obtained English citizenship in 1727, and
never looked back.
 |
| Handel and King George I on the Thames putatively on 7/17/1717 Edouard Conrad Hamman (1819-1888) |
Although Handel had composed a few oratorios
in his early years in England, he initially made his name there by composing
operas, the most successful of which were scored with Italian libretti. Handel did not
start seriously composing oratorios until the 1730s. By that time, the public’s
seemingly insatiable appetite for opera
seria, which he more than any other composer had made famous, had faded.
Recognizing that his operatic meal ticket was gone, Handel seamlessly switched
gears and restarted composing oratorios, twenty-seven in all, virtually all of
which were set to English texts.
 |
| Charles Jennens (1700-1773) The librettist of Messiah |
In July of 1741, the librettist
Charles Jennens (who had previously given Handel the text for Saul) offered Handel a set of passages from
the King James Bible as possible material for a new oratorio. The selections
were from both the Old Testament (Isaiah, Malachi and Psalms), as well as from two of the canonical
gospels of the New Testament, Matthew and Luke, the book of Revelation, and the
epistles of Paul.
This material seemed to have resonated with Handel, as he began to compose
Messiah on August 22 of that year and completed it in just 24 days.
Handel signed the autograph “Solo Deo Gloria” (“Only to God
goes the Glory”), prompting commentators to suggest that Handel had felt he had received some form of divine inspiration in crafting Messiah, given the rapidity of its composition and the beauty of its form.
 |
| The Music Hall Fishamble Street, Dublin The venue of the premiere of Messiah April 13,1742 |
Messiah (HWV 56) had its premiere not in London, where Handel’s many
operas and prior oratorios had debuted, but in Dublin, at the then new Music Hall on Fishamble Street,
on April 13, 1742, to 700 attendees, and to the consternation of a great many back in England. Jennens was chagrined, commenting to a friend that
“it was some mortification to me to hear that instead of
performing Messiah here he has gone into Ireland with it." It seemed to have been a big hit in Dublin, though, as Handel biographer Donald Burrows relates that "so that the largest possible audience could be admitted to the concert, gentlemen were requested to remove their swords, and ladies were asked not to wear hoops in their dresses." (ref.1)
Messiah was indeed an unqualified success. A critic at the opening wrote that "words are wanting to express the exquisite delight that it (Messiah) afforded the crowded and admiring audience. The Sublime, the Grand, the Tender, adapted to the most elevated, majestic and moving words, conspired to transport and charm the ravished ear."
Messiah was indeed an unqualified success. A critic at the opening wrote that "words are wanting to express the exquisite delight that it (Messiah) afforded the crowded and admiring audience. The Sublime, the Grand, the Tender, adapted to the most elevated, majestic and moving words, conspired to transport and charm the ravished ear."
 |
| Handel in rare repose, in 1740 (age 55) by Phillip Mercier |
There is
another story, an essential part of Messiah lore: when King George II first heard the work, in London in 1743, he
was so taken by its now famous "Hallelujah" Chorus, that he stood up
during it, setting a precedent that is still adhered to by audiences worldwide.
Indeed, Messiah continued to gain in popularity. In the 1750, Handel performed it at the London Foundling Hospital, and that began its annual performance their for decades, and he subsequently the autograph copy of the work to the institution.
 |
| Handel in 1741, at age 56, the year of Messiah From the frontispiece of the first biography, by John Mainwaring (1760) |
In the years following his move from Salzburg to Vienna in 1781, Mozart developed a fascination for Baroque music, especially the compositions of Johann Sebastian Bach and Handel.
 |
| Wolfgang Amadè Mozart The unfinished c.1789 enlargement of the c.1782 oil by his brother-in law, Joseph Lange |
Mozart set his transcription of Messiah, entitled Der Messias (KV 572), to a 1775 German translation of the oratorio by
Christoph Daniel Ebeling, which Ebeling had in turn adapted from an earlier eponymous epic poem by Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock.
The premiere of Der Messias was presented on March 6th, 1789, appropriately within the magnificent baroque splendor of the Palffy Palace in Vienna, the residence of Count Johann Baptist Esterházy von Galántha, with Mozart himself conducting. Esterházy was a royal chamberlain and court councillor, himself a prominent patron of music, and a member of the Masonic lodge Zur Neugekrönten Hoffnung ("New Crowned Hope"), which Mozart had joined in 1785, after his own lodge consolidated with that of the Count.
Der Messias is neither a radical rethinking of Handel’s original work, nor a cavalier rescoring by Mozart done simply as a lark. Although only 48 years separated Messiah’s premiere and Mozart’s 1789 transcription, an enormous change had occurred in musical style. Handel lived and wrote squarely within the idiom and constraints of the Baroque era, whereas Mozart composed in the conventions of Classical Style.
The premiere of Der Messias was presented on March 6th, 1789, appropriately within the magnificent baroque splendor of the Palffy Palace in Vienna, the residence of Count Johann Baptist Esterházy von Galántha, with Mozart himself conducting. Esterházy was a royal chamberlain and court councillor, himself a prominent patron of music, and a member of the Masonic lodge Zur Neugekrönten Hoffnung ("New Crowned Hope"), which Mozart had joined in 1785, after his own lodge consolidated with that of the Count.
Der Messias is neither a radical rethinking of Handel’s original work, nor a cavalier rescoring by Mozart done simply as a lark. Although only 48 years separated Messiah’s premiere and Mozart’s 1789 transcription, an enormous change had occurred in musical style. Handel lived and wrote squarely within the idiom and constraints of the Baroque era, whereas Mozart composed in the conventions of Classical Style.
By Mozart’s time, symphonic orchestras were populated by
many different instruments, each lending its own tonal color, together giving a more textured sound than that of the simpler “symphonic bands” of strings and continuo, with occasional trumpets, of Handel’s
time. In addition, Mozart lived in the Age of the Enlightenment, when diversity
of ideas was being accepted.
One of the many aspects of Messiah
that is emblematic of Handel's genius is that he purposely wrote a
relatively spare orchestral part to the work, correctly foreseeing
that future composers would tinker with the orchestration, adding instrumental
forces here and tonal color there. In fact, Handel himself tinkered with Messiah throughout the rest of his life, and thus there is no accepted Urtext of the oratorio.
And so, it was upon this splendid musical palimpsest that Mozart went to work.
 |
| Baron Gottfried van Swieten (1733-1803) Mozart's friend and patron and a prominent Handelian in Vienna |
According to musicologist Teresa Frick, "... Baron van Swieten wanted Mozart to
"modernize" the oratorio (Messiah). This was a perfectly normal demand - the original work
and its composer still commanded great respect, of course, but this was no
obstacle to updating something "old-fashioned" to bring it into line with modern
taste. Mozart based his arrangement on the first edition of Handel’s score. From
this, two copyists produced a working score. For the English libretto and the
wind sections of the original, they substituted blank lines so that Mozart could
write his own accompaniment and insert the text written by van Swieten.
which was based on the German translation done by Klopstock and
Ebeling. " (ref 2)
A contemporary critic, Johann Friedrich Rochlitz, reviewing Der Messias, said of Mozart that "He has exercised the greatest delicacy by touching nothing that transcends the style of his time ... The choral sections are left as Handel wrote them and are only amplified cautiously now and again by wind instruments." (ref.3) Indeed, Mozart introduced a
significant amount of essential wind music to the score, adding parts for clarinets, horns, flutes, oboes and
bassoons, which did not appear in Handel’s original work. The clarinet had only been invented in Handel’s time, by J.C. Denner in Nuremberg around 1703, as an improvement over the chalumeau pipe, and it was not until the latter half of the eighteenth century, in Mozart’s era, that composers were seriously writing for the instrument. The bassoons are freed, in Mozart's adaptation, from the confines of their traditional buffo and basso roles of simple accompaniment. In Der Messias, they are given elegant, melodic obbligato filigrees in a number of arias.
At the same time, Mozart minimized the role of the trumpets in his arrangement, giving more of that responsibility to the horns and trombones, especially in the doubling and support of the SATB soloists. The reason was sheer practicality. By Mozart's time, the rare skill of playing the high tessitura celebratory trumpet was long gone. In the well-known aria, “The Trumpet Shall Sound,” Mozart wrote the obbligato part not for a natural valveless trumpet, as Handel had done, but for french horn !
Although Mozart left the orchestration of most of the choral sections as Handel had scored them, he did take some sections from the chorus and gave them to the SATB soloists, likely as a function of the number and talent of the forces he had at the time. It is interesting to note that whereas Handel likely employed about thirty choristers for the Dublin Messiah, Mozart had only 12 singers in his Der Messias chorus. Also, as there was no organ at Count Esterházy's palace, Mozart simply left Handel's organ part out of his transcription ! Eminent practicality.
At the same time, Mozart minimized the role of the trumpets in his arrangement, giving more of that responsibility to the horns and trombones, especially in the doubling and support of the SATB soloists. The reason was sheer practicality. By Mozart's time, the rare skill of playing the high tessitura celebratory trumpet was long gone. In the well-known aria, “The Trumpet Shall Sound,” Mozart wrote the obbligato part not for a natural valveless trumpet, as Handel had done, but for french horn !
Although Mozart left the orchestration of most of the choral sections as Handel had scored them, he did take some sections from the chorus and gave them to the SATB soloists, likely as a function of the number and talent of the forces he had at the time. It is interesting to note that whereas Handel likely employed about thirty choristers for the Dublin Messiah, Mozart had only 12 singers in his Der Messias chorus. Also, as there was no organ at Count Esterházy's palace, Mozart simply left Handel's organ part out of his transcription ! Eminent practicality.
 | ||
|
Mozart certainly had his own ideas in arranging Messiah. Mozart felt that Handel's construction of certain arias was lacking in variety, so he sensitively changed their tempi and harmonic structure. And in one instance, Mozart converted the somewhat dry soprano aria, "If God be for us," to a recitative. Evidently, van Swieten was pleased about this as he commented to Mozart that, "Your
idea of turning the text of the cold air (aria) into a recitative is splendid... Anyone
who is able to clothe Handel with such solemnity and taste that he pleases the
fashion-conscious fops on the one hand, while on the other hand still continues
to show himself superior, is a person who senses Handel’s worth, who understands
him, who has found the source of his expression and who can and will draw
inspiration from it." (ref 4)
Mozart added woodwind support to several of the solo lines, for example, to the exquisite "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion," and "Comfort ye." Mozart maintained the bel canto style in these arias (a genre in which Handel was so successful in his many operas) while adding his own own brilliance as a painter of tonal and atmospheric color. A convincing exemplar of this is in the Part Three duet, "O death, where is thy sting?", where Mozart added obbligato violas to the orchestration, prefiguring some of the sonorities in the Recordare movement of his Requiem of 1791.
Mozart eliminated one of the choral numbers, "Let all the angels of God," as well as the aria, "Thou art gone up on high." He took that most famous aria, "Rejoice greatly," from the soprano and gave it to the tenor. All of these Mozartean changes served not only to tighten up and dramatize the oratorio, it also made the work over a half hour shorter, which may have mattered in what had become a progressive and busy Viennese society.
Mozart added woodwind support to several of the solo lines, for example, to the exquisite "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion," and "Comfort ye." Mozart maintained the bel canto style in these arias (a genre in which Handel was so successful in his many operas) while adding his own own brilliance as a painter of tonal and atmospheric color. A convincing exemplar of this is in the Part Three duet, "O death, where is thy sting?", where Mozart added obbligato violas to the orchestration, prefiguring some of the sonorities in the Recordare movement of his Requiem of 1791.
Mozart eliminated one of the choral numbers, "Let all the angels of God," as well as the aria, "Thou art gone up on high." He took that most famous aria, "Rejoice greatly," from the soprano and gave it to the tenor. All of these Mozartean changes served not only to tighten up and dramatize the oratorio, it also made the work over a half hour shorter, which may have mattered in what had become a progressive and busy Viennese society.
 |
| The sublime 1974 Sir Charles Mackerras essaying of Der Messias, reissued on CD in 1990 Edith Mathis, Peter Schreir, Theo Adam, Birgit Finnila |
Upon first listening, Der Messias serves up so many new vistas, and not just in the new orchestration; these insights also pertain to the German text.
Perhaps "Denn die herrlichkeit Gottes" does sound a bit different from "And the Glory of the Lord," and even if hearing the words "Alle Tale, mach Hoch
Erhaben" instead of "Ev’ry Valley Shall be Exalted,” is a bit jarring, it is also refreshing, especially when that same gorgeous and recognizable supporting Handelian melody is still there, just lovingly enriched by Mozart's nuanced orchestral accompaniment.
Handel’s Messiah
remains one of the monumental achievements of western civilization. There is no "right" or "wrong" Messiah. There is simply Messiah.
Whether it is Handel's original or revised version, Mozart’s arrangement that you will hear this evening, or perhaps another
adaptation such as that of Ebenezer Prout in the late nineteenth century (which drew heavily on Der Messias), Messiah will always remain the
singular composition that was envisioned and created by "Mister Haendel" - a work of art that is ever sonorous,
sacred, noble, uplifting and sublime.
ref 1 Donald Burrows, Handel: Messiah, Cambridge University Press, 1991
ref 2 Teresa Frick http://www.kuk-art.com/English/Maulbronn/S-Mozart-Messiah.html
ref 3 Frick, ibid.
ref 4 Frick, ibid.
@ Vincent P. de Luise M.D. 2012.
